Document card
C cnocimient theory: psbilidd and limits
Sent by Cheat Sheets and classified under Others and Others at 27, February, 2008.
Written in
Spanish and has a size of 5033 bytes
This document belongs to the group Cheat Sheets
-C theory of CNOCIMIENT: PSBILIDD And Limited
Kant seeks to set limits sensitive knowledge. Set limits on the ratio is negative. It is impossible to fix the metaphysical basis for scientific knowledge. This negativity for the first time will move a second time, which leads us to find out one second use of reason, the practical.
The starting point of thinking Kantian
Kant tries to find out the possibility of metaphysics as science. It starts wondering if possible and rigorous scientific knowledge about the realities that we have no knowledge sensitive and go to the contents of the metaphysics of his time (rationalist Wolff). These contents: World, soul and God are beyond our knowledge, and are part of what is called metaphysics. The question now is "Is it possible metaphysics as science? Kant goes to the science of his time (Newton) and finds two facts:
a) The science progresses : In all scientific fields are built new theories, most based on previous ones. In metaphysics that there is no progress since it was still discussing problems and always after such a long time repeating the same arguments about God, soul and world.
b) scientific ; ficos reach agreement : What one discovers and shows appears to be appropriate for others. Trials of science goals are universal, necessary and nobody can deny. In metaphysics, thinkers contradict each other and eliminate any possibility of agreement.
If metaphysics wants to be science must be built on the same level as mathematics or physics and if not is science must abandon the claim scientifically speaking on topics that we can not have experience.
- conditions that make it possible science.
kant believes there are q 2 cndicions ncsarias xra q is psible knowledge cientifc:
a) Conditions empirical : It stems from the fact that any science se basa en la experiencia. To capture such data should be made specific conditions, and that concrete might be altered. For example, if I say "I see a stoplight" I see a stoplight involves a number of conditions, such as the presence of light, the position of the same
b) Conditions momentous or priori : Tda science relies on some contents prior to the experience, in conditions universal, necessary, common to all subject, which can not be altered. For example if I say "I saw a stoplight" inevitably ask Where? When? It is obvious that we need to always observe an echo of an area and a time to make this experience possible.
- Theory of trials: the trials of synthetic priori
The two kinds of knowledge (or sensitive scientific and vulgar) are manifested in proposals or what the logical call trials. These join two terms that may be things, properties or modes.
a) analytical Trials: They are those in which the predicate falls on the idea of the subject. The predicate does not add information. For instance "The triangle has three angles" These trials are characterized by being universal, necessary explanatory. They are based on the principle of contradiction, because in them there is no contradiction between the subject (triangle) and preached (three corners).
b) Trials synthetic : The predicate is not covered by the idea of subject, here the predicate adds new content, unknown to the subject. For example "Some bodies are heavy." To know the truth of this trial should I turn to the experience. These trials are two-fold.
-Trial synthetic to post : There are those in which the truth depends on experience. They are individuals, troops and extended (expand knowledge). Example: "The table is Andrea green"
-Trial a priori synthetic : We provide information and at the same time are universal and necessary. Example "Everything that happens has a cause." These trials are universal, necessary and extensive. These are the trials themselves of science, which permitira Kant see if metaphysics is science or not.
Kant seeks to set limits sensitive knowledge. Set limits on the ratio is negative. It is impossible to fix the metaphysical basis for scientific knowledge. This negativity for the first time will move a second time, which leads us to find out one second use of reason, the practical.
The starting point of thinking Kantian
Kant tries to find out the possibility of metaphysics as science. It starts wondering if possible and rigorous scientific knowledge about the realities that we have no knowledge sensitive and go to the contents of the metaphysics of his time (rationalist Wolff). These contents: World, soul and God are beyond our knowledge, and are part of what is called metaphysics. The question now is "Is it possible metaphysics as science? Kant goes to the science of his time (Newton) and finds two facts:
a) The science progresses : In all scientific fields are built new theories, most based on previous ones. In metaphysics that there is no progress since it was still discussing problems and always after such a long time repeating the same arguments about God, soul and world.
b) scientific ; ficos reach agreement : What one discovers and shows appears to be appropriate for others. Trials of science goals are universal, necessary and nobody can deny. In metaphysics, thinkers contradict each other and eliminate any possibility of agreement.
If metaphysics wants to be science must be built on the same level as mathematics or physics and if not is science must abandon the claim scientifically speaking on topics that we can not have experience.
- conditions that make it possible science.
kant believes there are q 2 cndicions ncsarias xra q is psible knowledge cientifc:
a) Conditions empirical : It stems from the fact that any science se basa en la experiencia. To capture such data should be made specific conditions, and that concrete might be altered. For example, if I say "I see a stoplight" I see a stoplight involves a number of conditions, such as the presence of light, the position of the same
b) Conditions momentous or priori : Tda science relies on some contents prior to the experience, in conditions universal, necessary, common to all subject, which can not be altered. For example if I say "I saw a stoplight" inevitably ask Where? When? It is obvious that we need to always observe an echo of an area and a time to make this experience possible.
- Theory of trials: the trials of synthetic priori
The two kinds of knowledge (or sensitive scientific and vulgar) are manifested in proposals or what the logical call trials. These join two terms that may be things, properties or modes.
a) analytical Trials: They are those in which the predicate falls on the idea of the subject. The predicate does not add information. For instance "The triangle has three angles" These trials are characterized by being universal, necessary explanatory. They are based on the principle of contradiction, because in them there is no contradiction between the subject (triangle) and preached (three corners).
b) Trials synthetic : The predicate is not covered by the idea of subject, here the predicate adds new content, unknown to the subject. For example "Some bodies are heavy." To know the truth of this trial should I turn to the experience. These trials are two-fold.
-Trial synthetic to post : There are those in which the truth depends on experience. They are individuals, troops and extended (expand knowledge). Example: "The table is Andrea green"
-Trial a priori synthetic : We provide information and at the same time are universal and necessary. Example "Everything that happens has a cause." These trials are universal, necessary and extensive. These are the trials themselves of science, which permitira Kant see if metaphysics is science or not.
Tags: c teoría del cnocimient: psbilidd y límites, teoría de los juicios: los juicios sintéticos a, el punto de partida del pensamiento kantiano, condiciones que hacen posible la ciencia, los científicos se ponen de acuerdo, condiciones trascendentales o a priori
This card has visited 5 times
To look for related
Write a comment
English

To return to the directory

